@The Pentagon 703.695.1992 | 703.695.1997 | PLC2
@The Mark Center 571.372.3613 | Room B1-D13
Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2006
Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2001
National Defense Panel
Includes National Defense Panel report “Transforming Defense: National Security in the 21st
Century” and the NDP assessment of the QDR.
The QDR Page, A Compendium of Online Resources about U.S. Defense Strategy,
Force Planning, and Policy Reviews
The largest and most comprehensive website on the QDR, sponsored by the Project on Defense
Alternatives at the Commonwealth Institute in Cambridge, MA.
Check online catalog for availability of these books.
Cohen, William, John Shalikashvili, and Jim Lehrer. Department of Defense Newsmakers. Transcript. Online NewsHour. Public Broadcasting Service. May 19, 1997.
Conetta, Carl, and Charles Knight.
Backwards into the Future: How the Quadrennial Defense Review Prepares America for the Wrong Century.
Cambridge, MA, Project on Defense Alternatives, 1997.
22 p.
Call no.: US23.3 .R477 1997
Condray, Patrick M. Charting the Nation’s Course: Strategic Planning Processes in the 1952-53
“New Look” and the 1996-97 Quadrennial Defense Review. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL, School of
Advanced Airpower Studies, Air University, 1999. 56 p.
Call no.: U153 .C6 1999
Davis, Paul K., Richard L. Kugler, and Richard J. Hillestad.
Strategic Issues and Options for the
Quadrennial Defense Review.
Rand Documented Briefing DB-201-OSD. Santa Monica, CA, Rand
Corporation, 1997. 55 p.
Call no.: Q180 .A1 R2 no. 201
Metz, Steven. American Strategy Issues and Alternatives for the Quadrennial Defense Review. DTIC
report no. ADA385275. Carlisle Barracks, PA, Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2000.
137 p.
Call no.: UA23 .M47 2000
QDR Analysis: Lessons Learned and Future Directions Mini-symposium, 7-9 April 1998, Johns Hopkins
University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Baltimore, Maryland. DTIC report no. ADA3865752. Alexandria,
VA, Military Operations Research Society, 1999. 1 volume.
Call no.: U260 .K65 1999
Quadrennial Defense Review: From 1997-2001.
DTIC report no. ADA381549. Arlington, VA, Association
of the United States Army, 2000. 4 p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .Q84 2000
Schrader, John Y., Leslie Lewis, and Roger Allen Brown. Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR)
Analysis: a Retrospective Look at Joint Staff Participation.
Rand Documented Briefing DB-236-JS,
DTIC report no. ADA360825. Santa Monica, CA, Rand Corporation, 1999. 106 p.
Call no.: Q180 .A1 R2 no. 236
Thomason, James S., etc. al. Quadrennial Review Process: Lessons Learned from the 1997
Review and Options for the Future. DTIC report no. ADA355228. Alexandria, VA, Institute for
Defense Analyses, 1998. 181 p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .Q83 1998
United States. Congress. House. Committee on National Security. National Security Report:
Background and Perspective on Important National Security and Defense Policy Issues. Volume 1,
Issue 4. A Look Ahead atthe Quadrennial Defense Review. DTIC report no. ADA377564. Washington,
DC. House National Security Committee, 1997. 4 p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .N26 1997
United States. Congress. House. Committee on National Security. Reserve Component Issues
from the Quadrennial Defense Review: Hearing Before the Military Personnel Subcommittee of the
Committee on National Security, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First
Session, Hearing Held July 29, 1997. H.N.S.C. 105-19. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1998. 192 p.
Call no.: SuDocs
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. Quadrennial Defense Review:
Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth
Congress, First Session, May 20 and 21, 1997. Senate Hearing 105-197. Washington, DC, U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1997. 200 p.
Call no.: SuDocs
United States. Department of Defense. Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review. DTIC report no.
ADA326554. Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Defense, 1997. 69 p.
Call no. : UA23.3 .R475 1997
United States. General Accounting Office.
Quadrennial Defense Review: Some Personnel Cuts and
Associated Savings May Not Be Achieved.
Report no. GAO/NSIAD-98-100. Washington, DC, U.S.
General Accounting Office, 1998. 43 p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .R477 1998
Vickers, Michael G. and Steven M. Kosiak.
The Quadrennial Defense Review, an Assessment.
Washington, DC, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 1997. 31p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .V52 1997
Barnes, Frederick H. “QDR (Quadrennial Defense Review) and the Likely Impact of US Defences.” Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, Nov.-Dec. 1997, v. 25, no. 11-12, p. 16-17.
De Czege, Huba Wass. “Precision Decisions: To Build a Balanced Force, the QDR (Quadrennial Defense Review) Might Consider These Four Propositions.” Armed Forces Journal International, Oct. 2000, v. 138, no. 3, p. 54.
Isenberg, David. “The Quadrennial Defense Review: Reiterating the Tired Status Quo.” Cato Policy Analysis, Sept.17, 1998, no. 317.
Lewis, Leslie. “Quadrennial Defense Review 2001: Managing Change in the Department of Defense.” National Security Studies Quarterly, Autumn 2000, v. 6, no. 4, p. 71-94.
Patterson, Kristin. “QDR (Quadrennial Defense Review).” National Guard, Sept. 2000, v. 54, no. 9, p. 28-31.
Roosevelt, Ann. “2001 QDR: First of a Series; Army QDR: of Forces, Resources, and Risk.” Defense Week, Jan. 2, 2001, v. 22, no. 1, p. 1; 6-7.
Roosevelt, Ann. “2001 QDR: Second in a Series; Air Force QDR, America’s New 911 Force?” Defense Week, Jan. 8, 2001, v. 22, no. 2, p. 1; 6-7.
Roosevelt, Ann. “2001 QDR: Last of a Series.” Defense Week, Jan. 29, 2001, v. 22, no. 5, p. 1; 7- 8.
Snodgrass, David E. “The QDR (Quadrennial Defense Review): Improve the Process to Improve the Product.” Parameters, Spring 2000, v. 30, no. 1, p. 57- 68.
Tirpak, John A. “The Needs of the Force: the Chief Sums Up the Air Force’s Situation Heading into the Quadrennial Defense Review.” Air Force Magazine, Sept. 2000, v. 83, no. 9, p. 40-45.
Tirpak, John A. “Projections from the QDR”. Air Force Magazine, Aug. 1997, v. 80, no. 8., p. 42-49.
Wilson, George C. “Inside Moves: as Another Quadrennial Defense Review Looms, an Excerpt from a New Book Looks at What Went Wrong with the Last One.” Air Force Times, Sept. 27, 1999, v. 60, no. 8, p. 16-18.
Turner, Carolyn S. Quadrennial Defense Review: a Bibliography. Washington, DC, National Defense
University Library, 1997. 26 p.
Call no.: UA23.3 .R476 1997